Money has always been a motivation, provided the issue of controversy surrounding it is cleared and accountability is prioritized then quality will not be compromised. Speaking of controversy, I just did some tweaks on the GMO stuff and left a note but here it is all the same regarding my changes which are:

Mostly minor and dealing with the initial language of the introduction and a few repetitions and spelling errors in the ensuing paragraphs which I corrected. I suggest the title is also changed to "Genetically modified organism argument (Ghana).

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sandister Tei <sandistertei@gmail.com> wrote:

Employed editing? Clarify. Because a company can employ someone to edit.

Regards,
Sandister Tei
-----
Cardiff University
JOMEC -- International Journalism
www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford@gmail.com> wrote:

Interesting read. Your question of who is right? Hmmm, for me, the Wikimedia foundation is right.

The Wikimedia foundation frowns on paid editing, that's it I think. Employed editing is the way forward.

Rexford | Africa Center | wikiafrica.net | sent from Tab

On Feb 1, 2014 6:39 PM, "Sandister Tei" <sandistertei@gmail.com> wrote:

So someone got into trouble for paid editing. The Wikipedia article on paid editing doesn't say it's always wrong.

Who is right?

Regards,
Sandister Tei
-----
Cardiff University
JOMEC -- International Journalism
www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
Wikimedia-GH@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh

Oral Ofori of #TheAfricanDream: Webpage