I just wanted to share the Cascadia Meetup for WikiConference USA:
http://wikiconferenceusa.org/wiki/Cascadia_Meetup

Who else from the region will be attending? It would be nice if we could find a time to meet and discuss Wikimedia activity in the Cascadia region.

Pine, et al., please feel free to contribute to this page if you wish to show support for a user group, or if you have ideas for group discussion.

Jason


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Lane Rasberry <lane@bluerasberry.com> wrote:
Pine,

I started a list of other organizations which are friendly to Wikipedia and a list of venues which people can use to host events.
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Cascadia#Meetups_by_other_friendly_organizations>

About getting official status as a Wikimedia Foundation partner - the only requirement is to have three people agree to be a local contact. In other groups sometimes these local contacts have not been active Wikipedians, and the major responsibility is being dependable as a point of contact if something arises. For example, some organization in Seattle may contact a general Wikipedia forum asking for a referral, and the local group would be expected to at least refer them to whatever resources are at hand or tell them that no help is available.

There is an upcoming WikiConference in New York City next week. Several people from Seattle and Portland accepted scholarships to attend, and I will be asking them to meet each other and start the "user group" when they are here. If that sits for a while and we get a few more people interested, perhaps leading to having 8-12 Wikipedians regularly attending the monthly meetups in Seattle and Portland, then we could apply for community organizer funds especially if we can get a partner organization to also match the funding and do staff supervision. If it comes to pass that other people in the region would benefit from having travel expenses and hostel lodging funded to attend Wikimedia events then that is available for people who regularly contribute to Wikimedia projects, and meeting other people in person does make for more efficient partnerships.

Something else about getting official chapter status - in the last month our own Cindy (user:Cindamuse) from Kennewick had just joined the Wikimedia Affiliations committee, which is the group that issues official recognition to local community groups and grants them licenses to use the Wikipedia/Wikimedia names and logos. She would have continued to be an awesome supporter and organizer for us but on the night she arrived at a conference she met the other Wikipedians there then died in the night unexpectedly of a long-standing health problem. Cindy had wanted Wikipedia outreach to the major universities in the area and women's engagement programs developed. It is a horrible loss for our family and a big loss for our regional Wikimedia community, but it does show that some people had been planning what you propose, Pine.

In the example you gave, we might be able to ask the Gates Foundation to hire a Wikipedia community organizer to help manage local events and coordinate projects with research organizations in the area and beyond. Here is the grant request which led to the Wikimedia Foundation paying Consumer Reports, who after the grant period have kept me as their Wikipedian.
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:PEG/Consumer_Reports/Wikipedian_in_Residence>

I pitched Gates Foundation staff many times when I was in Seattle and a bit over the last couple of years. Things have changed since then, but I still think it would be in their interest to promote Wikipedia. For anyone who wants to get an in to the confluence where biomedical research meets the public, there are lots of opportunities in Seattle to attend public presentations by any organization one can find, but I might recommend attending this June 3 meetup by Northwest Association of Biomedical Researchers.
<https://www.nwabr.org/events-programs/community-events/community-conversation-series>
All the people at this meetup are looking for new ideas for their organization.




On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:19 AM, ENWP Pine <deyntestiss@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hail Cascadians,

You probably know about https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cascadia

Our contact at TA3M Seattle is assembling a list of FOSS organizations in the Seattle area. If you know of FOSS, GLAM, or other organizations in our region which would have common interests with Wikimedia Cascadia, please add them to the Cascadia page on Meta. This will help us to think about where we can do outreach.

One idea I am currently thinking seriously about is how to have a Wikimedian in Residence position made available at the Gates Foundation, if they are willing to host one. I think that will be easier to do once we are officially a user group or thematic organization.

Does anyone have thoughts to share about us becoming a recognized user group or thematic organization? I think this would benefit us because we would be allowed to use the Wikimedia trademarks and would provide easier access to other organizations like the Gates Foundation, other FOSS organizations, events which are only for journalists, and other opportunities. I am *not* proposing that we become a chapter because we are too small at this time. That might come later. For now, I think being an officially recognized Wikimedia user group would serve our needs well.

Pine



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list
Wikimedia-Cascadia@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia




--
Lane Rasberry
user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list
Wikimedia-Cascadia@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia