Or, if you want to start any topics of discussion for the meetup at the WikiConference, see:
http://wikiconferenceusa.org/wiki/Cascadia_Meetup

Jason 


On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Jason Moore <anotherbelieverwp@gmail.com> wrote:
Glad to see interest in formal organization. Perhaps we can continue this conversation at Meta?

I, too, think we could have a successful application to obtain user group status. This would mean official recognition from the Wikimedia Foundation, provides funding opportunities, and is a step towards chapter status. Before we worry about bylaws, etc., I think we should focus on user group recognition.

Pine, Mako, would you two be interested in being co-contacts for the Wikimedia Cascadia user group? I can be one, too, which makes three already.  I had hoped to get some people together for an in-person Cascadia meetup at the upcoming WikiConference USA, perhaps for the purpose of putting together a user group plan.  Perhaps this is easier to do remotely since there is already interest.

Jason


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, ENWP Pine <deyntestiss@hotmail.com> wrote:
I may have some time in the next few weeks to get us more organized on Meta. Becoming a user group looks relatively lightweight and I think we would qualify if we put in an application. Of course, anyone else who wants to curate the Meta pages and submit a user group application can do so!

If we start to do regular business, especially with people outside the immediate Wikimedia volunteer community or if we start to accept grant money, I think we should incorporate for liability protection and tax reporting reasons. Being an unincorporated nonprofit association that gets sued, such as because someone in our group made a copyright violation, would be bad. Also, incorporation may provide us more ability to get grants and in-kind contributions especially if we qualify for 501(c)(3). Incorporation is not difficult but it involves some time for applications to be created and processed. What gets tricky is selecting board members, drafting bylaws, and doing other necessary administrative work beyond the capacity of volunteers, so we'll need to think about that when the time comes. We are small enough now that all active participants could be board members, but if we scale to 30 members we will likely need an elected board. That is a good problem to have, and the Affiliations Committee can provide guidance for us throughout the organizing process.

http://nonprofit.about.com/od/faqsthebasics/f/unincorporationassociation.htm

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affcom

Pine

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list
Wikimedia-Cascadia@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia