The legal issues in the bylaws are slowly being dealt with, but the other big obstacle we have now is deciding what we will officially be doing with our money. To be an education-related charity we have to either be running a school, be doing research, or be maintaining a museum, art gallery. Simply making information available to the public does not count as "education". We can also call ourselves a "library" if we are a community charity rather than an education charity. If you have any ideas about what our first project should be, mention it at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Canada/Proposed_by-lawsI, personally, think that the school and research options are too ambitious, though they would make good long-term goals. For the purpose of our application I think our first objective for our donations should be setting up an online database of Canada-related media and texts to make ourselves fall under the "museum, art gallery, or library" categories. This database could be distinct from Wikisource and Commons by allowing items that are free for non-commercial use, which seems to be a common copyright of stuff produced by Canadian governments.-Jeffery Nichols (Arctic.gnome)On 11-Jul-09, at 4:24 PM, Kevin T wrote:So the Legal issue is the only block from setting up the organization in reality? BTW, when will be next meeting?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jeffery Nichols <arctic.gnome@gmail.com> wrote:
To be fair, there are probably a lot of people who are interested in
helping but who don't like reading through the legalese of bylaws. As
long as a couple of us keep at them, I bet we'll find a lot more
people willing to do work once we actually start doing real-world work.
That being said, I'll speed up my replies so we actually have a clear
mission statement before you leave for Buenos Aires.
-Jeffery Nichols (Arctic.gnome)
On 9-Jul-09, at 7:15 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Jeffery Nichols wrote:
>> Only a couple people made it, so there wasn't much of a meeting. We
>> just committed to discussing the bylaws on the talk page more and
>> will
>> have another meeting when the current problems with them are
>> resolved.
> What would help is if more people participated in developing the
> details
> on that talk page. Several issues require very careful consideration
> that cannot be achieved in an online meeting.
>
> I get bored waiting for responses, and the very few people who have
> anything to say make me think that only those few have any interest at
> all in a chapter. I plan to be in Buenos Aires for Wikimania, and it
> would certainly help if I could go there with an understanding of what
> people want out of this process.
>
> Ec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-ca mailing list
> Wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-ca mailing list
Wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-ca mailing list
Wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-ca mailing list
Wikimedia-ca@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca