The committee sent around a corrected table of ratings; the process + color-system were confusing to everyone.
There were 9 evaluation criteria, grouped into 4 clusters (WM background, skills, regional experience, human rights + representation).
They couldn't decide how to summarize these, so did it two ways: first by overall average across criteria, then by average within the 9 criteria.
Thanks Ben for helping to get this corrected. After hearing everyone's feedback this week, we will put in our vote at the week's end.