I'm still inclined to do this regionally, even if we only agree on one candidate, for example. If we want to even think of ourselves as being a viable grouping of Asian chapters, we need to go beyond this national mode of thinking and start looking at things from a broader perspective.
As it is, even people in the region think the idea of Wikimedia Asia is but that: an idea. We should at least try to prove them wrong.
Josh
Sent from my HTC
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Deryck Chan <deryckchan@wikimedia.hk> wrote:I completely agree, that's why I suggested to go as individual
> The main difference between us and Iberocoop is that culturally we're a much
> more diverse bunch then them, therefore within the Wikimedia sphere our
> interests are less aligned with each other than they.
chapters as another option.
But then again what the point of having this list if we keep
> With neither Craig nor Theo putting representing and developing Asian
> Wikimedian communities as their main agendum (correct me if I'm wrong),
> coordinated voting between Asian chapters is probably not in the best
> interests of individual chapters among us.
separating each other? For fun? * it might work too IMHO *
So? One (HK) say we have to go individually for the chapter's best
interest, another (India) said we should do this regionally, how about
others?
--
Siska Doviana | Ketua Umum (Chair) 2011-2012
Wikimedia Indonesia
Cell. +62 816 484 5052
~~~~
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters