On 8 April 2012 23:01, Siska Doviana <siska.doviana@wikimedia.or.id> wrote:

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Deryck Chan <deryckchan@wikimedia.hk> wrote:
> The main difference between us and Iberocoop is that culturally we're a much
> more diverse bunch then them, therefore within the Wikimedia sphere our
> interests are less aligned with each other than they.

I completely agree, that's why I suggested to go as individual
chapters as another option.

> With neither Craig nor Theo putting representing and developing Asian
> Wikimedian communities as their main agendum (correct me if I'm wrong),
> coordinated voting between Asian chapters is probably not in the best
> interests of individual chapters among us.

But then again what the point of having this list if we keep
separating each other? For fun? * it might work too IMHO *

We all know that - to help us talk to each other, and investigate the possibility of cooperating. If we decide to join up, great. But even if we decide to go separate ways, it's good that we've talked to each other and have come to that conclusion.

So? One (HK) say we have to go individually for the chapter's best
interest, another (India) said we should do this regionally, how about
others?

--
Siska Doviana | Ketua Umum (Chair) 2011-2012
Wikimedia Indonesia
Cell. +62 816 484 5052
~~~~

Dukung upaya kami membebaskan pengetahuan:
http://wikimedia.or.id/wiki/Wikimedia_Indonesia:Donasi

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters