Dear Colleagues,
The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message and attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Hi Kartika,I understand that that the chapters-selected board seat has fiduciary duty,but from the view of Asian chapters, a person who have a good understandingabout Asia is needed to cooperate with Asian chapters, and also suit with themovement of foundation for the countries like India.Lodewijk and Alice are from Euro and i doubt how much they know about Asia.Cheers,On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Kartika Sari Henry <kartika.sari.henry@wikimedia.or.id> wrote:
Hi Deryck,
I don't expect the candidates put Asian communities as their main agenda. Candidates should be fair and representing all (or most) chapters if they get elected. Referring to this page, the Selected Board will have fiduciary duty.
Under the Board selection procedures, trustees are elected or appointed by different communities or appointed by the Board directly. Nevertheless, a trustee's fiduciary duties are owed to all of the Foundation, not to the specific group that elected or appointed the trustee.
Personally, I am willing to reach consensus regionally. At least, so far we only turn in 4 names: Lodewijk, Craig, Alice, and Theo (not so much diverse) :P
Regards,
Kartika
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Deryck Chan <deryckchan@wikimedia.hk> wrote:The main difference between us and Iberocoop is that culturally we're a much more diverse bunch then them, therefore within the Wikimedia sphere our interests are less aligned with each other than they.
With neither Craig nor Theo putting representing and developing Asian Wikimedian communities as their main agendum (correct me if I'm wrong), coordinated voting between Asian chapters is probably not in the best interests of individual chapters among us.
Deryck
On Apr 8, 2012 7:29 PM, "Siska Doviana" <siska.doviana@wikimedia.or.id> wrote:
To add, I believe there are people from Indian chapter and Bangladesh in this list? How do you guys feel?
Kartika prompt to me that Asian chapters combine are as equal as Iberocoop in terms of quantity; IN, ID, BD, MK, TW, HK, PH : seven. If we can say Asian chapters decided to vote for X and Y, then it means we can actually function regionally. Or we can choose to do it individually, either way i'm cool with it.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters
--Kartika Sari Henry | Sekretaris Jenderal (Secretary General) 2011-2012
Wikimedia Indonesia
Cell. +62812 8012 767
Dukung upaya kami membebaskan pengetahuan:
http://wikimedia.or.id/wiki/Wikimedia_Indonesia:Donasi
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters
--MorganSent from my Ubuntu
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-asia-chapters mailing list
Wikimedia-asia-chapters@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-asia-chapters