Thanks for the answer Winnie This is a challenging solution... If this is the path to go, then I think it would need clarifications on that page : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2021/Scholarships 1) First, it would require a clarification to the individual people looking for support that they should consider contacting one of the approved group to ask them for individual support (taken into account geography, currency, language, thematic... ) Right now... any person living in Europe, or in USA, or in Asia... would rightfully wonder who they can ask to. If I lived in Japan... what would be my best bet... should I ask Wikimedia Polska or Wikimedia Ghana ? How much chance do I stand of getting a favorable answer ? Probably none. So if members were more aware of that, perhaps members would have the time to make sure a UserGroup that would agree to support them, make an application. I think it would be a good idea to do that rapidly so that individuals get to realize that they probably can ask no approved group. It might give them to idea to contact their nearest UserGroup to ask them to apply. 2) I think the UserGroups which applied should be informed that they might get some requests some completely unknown people from all over the world. And they should make sure they have the mecanisms to actually answer and support. Do they know that ? So again, that means that... if I live in Japan... and I contact the Ghana UserGroup to get supported... then the Ghana UserGroup would not be surprised and would consider my request with appropriate interest and willingness to support. Even though we do not speak the same language, do not use the same currency, do not work on the same project etc. Many usergroups do not have staff, nor even a bank account, and may not be set-up to do international wire transferts. For example, I am contact member of the offline usergroup. It would make sense for the offline usergroup to receive some participation requests since our operations are largely in countries where connexion data could be big. But the usergroup is just a group. There is no legal entity behind it; nor staff to manage request; no bank account to wire money to anyone. So can not help in anyway. If you want my honest feedback on the solution you mention ("pick up one of the affiliates which got funding and ask its team for support"), that will generally NOT work. Which means that the current system will only serve those with good connexions and lucky enough that an affiliate they are members of, will actually make the request. Under an appearance of super cool Wikimania participation support (data, childcare etc.), we are setting up a really unfair system, where people will be supported based on their understanding and knowledge of the ropes, and based on their involvement as members of an affiliate, and on the proactiveness of the usergroups. I am not blaming you, the COT team does within the constraints forced on them. I do understand that and I fear there isn't much option to fix that in less than a month. I do get that and if you have no solution to offer, again, no blame. But _for the record_, I think it is really a non-equitable process and _I hope that it does not set the grounds to operate this way in the future in simular circonstances_. I do not consider it a good governance solution that a handful of affiliates make the decision on who gets support and who does not, with no other built-in mecanisms at all. Florence Le 08/07/2021 à 22:07, Winnie kabintie a écrit :