On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 00:15, Thomas Dalton <
thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 August 2011 01:10, Иванов Вячеслав <
v.ivanov@amikeco.ru> wrote:
>> Latin script may be so bewildering you know.
>> Reading a Hungarian or a Polish name in Latin may require knowing the orthography rules of those languages; and for reading an English name one may need to ask the bearer for the pronunciation :) And probably just IPA would be easier, though, yes, awkward too.
>
> For someone that knows IPA, IPA is definitely best. I don't think
> anyone will argue with that. For everyone else, though, the Latin
> alphabet at least gives us a fighting chance of getting close to the
> right pronunciation. You can always ask "did I say that right?" and
> get corrected. I would ask someone their name and, because it's an
> unfamiliar name to me, I would struggle to make out exactly what they
> said. If I could see it written down and hear it said, I could
> probably get it right.
>
> The other big problem with having names in IPA is that it requires
> attendees to know their name in IPA in order to put it on the name
> badge in the first place. That means it's only going to work when both
> the person whose name it is and the person reading it know IPA. That's
> going to be a pretty small proportion of pairings.