I am not sure about that is a waste of energy though
On 11/23/11 11:17 AM, James Forrester wrote:I agree that 19 months is short. The first three didn't even have that
> On 23 November 2011 19:07, Jan-Bart de Vreede<janbart@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> In the past years I have seen a lot of people spend a lot of time on different bids which never
>> made it (even though they were pretty good). Could this be the year that we change this
>> procedure and try to do things differently? I would love to explore how we can avoid a lot of
>> people wasting their energy...
>>
>> How about taking a little time to look at these and other imperfects of the current system
>> before jumping right in, and trying to see if we can improve it?
> Happy to pause things, but there's limited time (even if we just
> awarded it today, 19 months isn't a huge amount of time to organise an
> event which is quite a significant amount of work). Previously there
> have been calls for the Board to establish a "Committee" of some sort
> to oversee Wikimanias and try to come to some agreement about how to
> improve the system - but I worry that if we start discussions about
> how we're going to decide to decide we'll never get anywhere. :-)
>
much time.
Bidding is still a competitive process. I remember that the organizers
from Turin were very upset when their excellent bid failed. To get the
best bid I don't think we can avoid competition, though we can probably
develop a short list fairly early on, so that the less likely candidates
can limit their efforts.
Ray
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l