Concur with Markie. IRC has the larger capacity than skype and its
client is free. If you mean the voice chat, instead of text base
conversation, as a non native speaker of English, and as Transcom
chair, regarding the potential translation, I strongly oppose to have
our regular meeting on voice chat.
On Dec 22, 2007 8:15 AM, Wikinews Markie <newsmarkie@googlemail.com> wrote:
> right, i know im not mido :-) but i want to say a few things.
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2007 10:29 PM, simonpedia <simon@cols.com.au> wrote:> > Look, would you consider using skype for some of these discussions?--
> >
> > I'm not really used to using it a lot but it would seem friendlier than
> IRC (by itself)
> >
> > Have put a link to a Skypecast room I just set up, on this page
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communication_Projects_Group (bottom right)
> It could be left open all the time, if it's a useful thing. I can send the
> password if yu want.
>
> hmm skype, comercial and requires downloads. also its not used by CPG and
> IMO irc is fine and is used by many people to communicate normally. you
> have also been informed before of the different options of how to use IRC
> and to me it just seems like you want to use this because its convienent for
> you but its not to me so hey we go round in circles, but why change??
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l