My own grain of salt as well
A few months ago, Wikimedia France was looking for an african
wikipedian to facilitate an edit-a-thon in Africa as part of one
of WM FR projects. Wikimedia France was supporting his travelling
costs to the edit-a-thon place. A volunteer showed up, willing to
do it. He lived in a nearby country.
When it came to reimburse his travel costs, Wikimedia France asked
him to become a member of Wikimedia France to do so. The
wikipedian was perplex about this request and asked me what I
thought. I was perplex about this request as well and asked
explanation. I got it and it really made sense to me.
The main argument is insurance. If an association "pays" (hire) a
consultant/freelancer to facilitate an edit-a-thon, the person -
as a professional - normally is covered by his own professionnal
insurance. So if anything happens during the edit-a-thon, his
insurance will cover this. But if the person providing the
training is a volunteer, it is VERY likely that he has no
insurance to cover anything that might happen. A personal
insurance would probably not cover the situation. Only a
professional insurance could. If the trainer is not covered and
something happen, since the event is organized by Wikimedia
France, the "victim" would turn toward Wikimedia France.
Of course Wikimedia France has an insurance but the insurance
needs to be bordered. It can not cover anything, anyone, in all
situations. And one of the easiest border is... membership. A
contract can be drawn that covers members whilst they are
participating to an event organized by Wikimedia France. A
contract that would cover what could happen to anyone showing up
at an event organized by Wikimedia France is a different story.
So the best way recommanded by interested parties and councillors
is that any person reimbursed for an action done as part of
Wikimedia France activities should be a member of the association.
As such, he is covered by Wikimedia France insurance.
Risker statement "The Wikimedia movement has openly
embraced the lack of requirement to identify or create an
account/membership to participate since day one of
its existence." is actually... not correct. A lot of the
activity of the Wikimedia mouvement go through participation to a
User Group or a Wikimedia Chapter or various Thematic
Organisations. And identification and joining as member are
actually required in those cases.
Also... identification is also required to join various online
"tasks forces" such as steward or OTRS agent.
Flo
Le 18/03/16 09:48, Gabriel Thullen a écrit :
I will add my grain of salt to this discussion.
When I was young, and I was traveling a lot, I would stay
in Youth Hostels. Membership was mandatory.
Things have changed a bit, Youth Hostels now call themselves
"Hostelling International" and in most places membership is
no longer mandatory. But members (of any national
organization) get all sorts of discounts and other perks.
I do not understand what the problem is if a membership is
required in order to attend Wikimania. Does anybody have a
Real Life example where such a membership has posed a problem
? Or are we just kibitzing to pass the time until June ?
Gabe
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l