I like this vision very much. Like Lodewijk, I suggest the scholarships
piece should not be bid specific.
I've been thinking a great deal about scholarships, travel, and attempts to
build community via jet fuel. Some thoughts off the top of my head for the
new year:
I don't understand why the current scholarship criteria make no mention of
need.
Are they meant to be for newcomers, or for the same community members each
year?
I too am concerned that the current scholarship process tends to polarize
the community, and too often simply rewards long-time community members, or
those who are connected to large movement entities, with free travel:
rather than increasing the diversity of new voices and faces at global
events.
I think we should match every Euro spent on travel support with a Euro
spent on infrastructure for great virtual participation: cameras,
projectors, and video-screens for communities around the world (physical
tools they can keep and use for years); making space to share the faces and
voices of people who are unable to travel to the event; live-streaming
hubs stationed around the event itself; and support for getting all videos
up online within 24 hours.
I do remember why we moved away from finding other entities and
institutions to provide travel support: it seemed 'easier' to do it
ourselves. But as a result we are no longer empowering foundations that
care about global dialogue to support Wikimedia in this way; and we are no
longer learning from their criteria and understanding of the world.
This seems related to why we are funding so much of Wikimania directly from
global donations, rather than developing the fundraising and
sponsor-finding skills of our international community. This centralization
of how Wikimania and scholarships are funded makes the conference less
robust. It sets future conference up for failure: or at least an awkward
transition if we stop spending so much on them.
IIRC, the Fedora community faced this years ago: they initially were
thrilled to organize themselves at global events without much travel
support. Then RedHat started paying for the travel of most of the core
developers and community members. When they later stopped this, the core
community members stopped coming: they now felt that a full scholarship was
their due. It took a while for the conferences to become as useful again.
SJ
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
<nemowiki(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hello, today I and Martin have polished the
scholarship vision/program for
our Wikimania 2015 bid: <https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Esino_Lario/Scholarships>.
Considering a background and aiming for a long-term impact on the
Wikimedia mission, we propose the following principles: Transparency;
Accountability and self-reflection; Grassroot; Efficiency and fairness;
Innovation. From those we identify 4 external needs and 8 goals.
Please read the proposal and edit boldly or comment on talk page
or wherever. Keep in mind it's still a draft, not the official WMIT
proposal yet. While the bids warm up and the Wikimania discussion is still
quiet, we think it's useful for everyone to focus the discussion on some
specific areas in advance. (And if all bids adopt our idea of scholarships,
all the better!)
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266