Am 15.12.2011 03:03, schrieb Pete Forsyth:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:21 AM,
> Sure. I'm totally not going to try to
rail-road this discussion (or
> maybe it should be on-wiki?) by announcing a Jury when we're not sure
> how we'll proceed. :-)
I'm hoping to hear from some other folks here:
should we encourage James F.
to resume his planned course, and select/announce a jury ASAP, without
prejudice toward the question of whether a rotation system is implemented
I was a bit distracted for the last two weeks and my last status was
James' call for bids and jury members.
From my POV we should proceed with this quickly - I
discussion derailed a bit stating that the timeline is already quite
tense. While that's true it didn't help us getting to work ;-)
I know that James sent a few mails to potential jury members. My
suggestion is that he puts the names of those who agreed here:
Then we may have a short discussion / selection, define the actual jury
by the end of next week and then get things finally rolling.
My five Euro ¢.
Wikimedia CH - Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Wikimedia CH - Association for the advancement of free knowledge