As you know, I contacted you by email, but you stopped replying the instant you learned who I actually was.  I know you are really busy but I would like to understand the discrepancy here. Why were some good submissions, as ranked by the judges, not accepted?

On 03/06/2014 21:40, Edward Saperia wrote:
These were the subtracks:

Wikimedia
Evaluation
GLAM
Maps
Technology
Open Data
Diversity/Outreach
Free Culture
Open Scholarship
Social Machines
Special
Education

("Special" was for things like "Learn to Edit Wikipedia" which don't fit in the programme in the same way as the others)

The rest of the committee was mostly just happy that I did the work putting the programme together, I think.