I do believe, if the detail is encyclopedically valuable and illustates something important about the monument (i. e. inside of the cupola of a church) then it should be preserved. We in WLM CZ however remove most of the details, because they do not fill this criterium. I also think it is up to you which resolutions you would like to accept and which not. Frankly - in every WLM participating country people have different cameras. As far as I know, WLM India has a low ratio MB/picture, while Germany have a superb one. So a simple "template" for all the countries can hardly be used. Aktron Wikimedia Czech Republic ______________________________________________________________ Hi all, We got a lot of photos which show monuments' details, so I don't know whether to point out to the jury to eliminate those or not? I mean, do the winner photos have to show the objects in whole? The other thing is we got superb photos that are of low resolution (~1000x768) - should they be eliminated as well? The first round is over, with around 940 photos left for the main jurors to rate. Tamara ---------- _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

I assume with remove, you only mean that you don't consider them for a prize? (that is a fair reasoning I guess, under the 'usefulness' principle).