On 08/10/12 14:45, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
Moreover - it puts files on lists which have moved
to the relevant category. In case of Polish contest if the heritage
has its own category we asked mass-uploaders to put the file into the
category without heritage template in file description. See for
IMHO the files should both have the relevant identifier and be in the
If I came to the description page (eg. by Special:Search), I wouldn't
know it was a monument without having to visit all its categories, which
On the list there are also files with quite proper,
but probably too
lenghty heritage number. In Poland the number consist of:
a) the number itself - for example "A-253"
b) the date of registraton for example "A-253 z 18.03.1972"
c) the name of viodoship which registered the heritage, for example
""A-253 z 18.03.1972; województwo podkarpackie"
Numbers itslef are redundant - each voivodship has its own list
starting from A-1 till A-9999,
so for us this list of heratige without proper indetifiers is rather
useless and completely missleading. For us it is not a problem - as
our jury won't be using it - but it may produce false statistics for
our part of contest.
Argh. So you basically made a new division inside the template
parameter. I can compensate that in the code. I had no idea you were
Although there are multiple formats used:
A-1834 z 11.08.2008
916 z 09.11.1984
1101/92 z 14.04.1992
A/3102/78 i 79
A.734 z 24.05.1993
1598-A z 23.11.1995
What is the identifier that should be extracted?