What the previous years was done in NL is that each jurymember made his own (small) set, that then the jury decided on.
What lodewijk describes seems to be a voting engine, but I think a selection engine is nice as well. What I see for that:
- each jury member has his own list (starting out the same) - you can drop pictures a level or take them to the next level - after having done a first level, you can inspect the pictures in the next level to do the same till you have a small enough selection. - history per jury member, you don't want him to do it all at one go :-) - configurable settings regarding size of the pictures/number of pictures per page, easy changable on the fly. I can imagine the jury member to select on thumbnails in the first level, and eventually looking at full screen pictures at the end.
As far as I remember something like that has been proposed before, I thing a process like that can work as well. After that, the different selections should be combined deduplicated, and then a voting session might be held, or a selection process again in a joint session of the jury.
Does this make sense?
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Lodewijk wrote:
Hi Katie,
I'm particularly referring to the national processes here. I saw someone mention that India might get 100.000 images... (worst case?) and that got me thinking ;) Every country will have a slightly different process.
I think it is a nice approach to have people rate. If we can just then add access options (access for all, or for a specified group). I don't have a clou if WP is the best option. But bear in mind the interface should be able to hold up to 100.000 images. Ideally:
- It would allow organizers to simply insert a list of commons file names
for the photos
- It would allow organizers to specify who should have access to the voting
interface
- It would allow organizers to have an overview of who voted, how often
- it would allow the user to show X images on a page, on a specified size
and rank each of them
- It would allow the user to sort based on name, date, number of rankings
and current ranking
- It would include a simple option (clicking) to enlarge the picture, and
include a link to the detail page on commons.
Does that make sense?
Lodewijk
2012/6/21 aude aude.wiki@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Hi all,
is there anyone who would be willing to help set up a jury process tool that can be used in multiple countries? I'm looking for a software tool that makes juring more easy than going through commons categories. Would be happy to brainstorm if someone is willing to work it out.
We have a technical volunteer "intern" helping us in DC and this is something he wants to work on.
I'm not exactly sure how the process worked last year, but we're thinking either integrating something into the WordPress site so that people can browse photos (pulled from Commons, like InstantCommons) and rate them. A public voting phase could help narrow the selection for the jury, which could also make use of the tool.
Thoughts? suggestions? brilliant ideas?
Cheers, Katie
Thanks!
Lodewijk
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
-- Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia http://wikimediadc.org @wikimediadc / @wikimania2012
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu