Hi,

the rationale is the date when we want the final results to be in. We want to be able to send out the calendars by mid December - that means we need a design- and production cycle before that. Our estimate is that we need to start that by November 20. That also gives us a nice time frame to announce the results officially after collecting more info about the actual winners. 

My estimate is that the international jury needs 3-4 weeks to come to a result based on all these high quality images from all these different cultures. Hence that we came to October 21, which leaves a few days leeway. 

If it is totally unrealistic, we will have to put it later - but from our point of view the 21 would definitely fit in best. That leaves 3 weeks for your national jury to come to a result. Last year I think only one country didn't make the deadline of October 31, and that was because one specific judge didn't reply (and that combined with, as I understood it, nobody chasing the process at the first weeks). 

Best, 
Lodewijk

2012/8/8 Platonides <platonides@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk@effeietsanders.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to repeat the deadlines from
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012/Timeline
> once again, and would like to hear it very soon if one of the deadlines is
> not realistic for you, or if you have good reasons to change it. Especially
> the October 21 deadline is important. With that information, we will set the
> final deadlines on Saturday.

> * October 21: Deadline for submitting the 10 nominations for the
> international contest. This can be a private submission (with delayed
> publishing) and they do not have to be ordered. Being late for this deadline
> might result in having no nominations in the international contest - so make
> sure this is a realistic deadline for you.

Last year the deadline was on October 31, and several countries had
problems to get the results by that date. I don't think this year it
will be less problematic.
What was the rationale for cutting down the date? I wouldn't have moved it.

Regards