Yaroslav,If it's not one thing, then it's the other thing....
How strange that there are so many photo's of that bridge on Commons! I am glad to see I at least picked a good category to use for testing purposes.
The main gist of my story is that you need to think of the WLM list problem with the row template as being part of a triangular relationship within Wikipedia. The heritage number links via the row template to the Wikipedia article (infobox designation number?) which links to the Commons monument template with the unique identifier number in the photo or category. Sometimes there will be no picture, so nothing on commons, and sometimes there will be no article either, but your WLM row template list needs to have the infrastructure so that those two possibilities can be "found" by the erfgoed or any other bot. The Wikipedia article should have geocoordinates that match the geocoordinates in the in the commons files, and this is possible with the monuments database.
Jane
(off-topic to Yaroslav: they don't get the idea of geocoordinates in North Dakota)
2012/7/17 Yaroslav M. Blanter
<putevod@mccme.ru>
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:18:20 +0200, Jane Darnell wrote:
Hi Andrij,
I am trying to follow your logic because I think you are a bit stuck.
I noticed you didnt have any monuments on Wikimedia Commons yet, so I
just created some categories there for you and a template which you
can see here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Moscow_Bridge [7]
Note that the bridge was built in 1976 and thus is copyrighted as there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. (Most of the Ukraininan monuments of course have no such problem).
Cheers
Yaroslav