In the UK we are OK with anything that is both three dimensional and permanently on public show. Even so lots of temporary exhibited sculptures and two dimensional plaques murals and so forth get deleted.

Many other countries are much more problematic. I think we need a feeder database for images that can't yet be released on a full Commons compatible license but can be made available on a more restricted license. For example in some countries there is a no commercial use stipulation, but as I understand it it would be legal to take an image of something like that and load it onto a site that allowed such images. Ideally it would be tagged with a "safe to migrate to commons after" date. OK in some cases it will be many decades before those images can migrate, but there is no deadline and we can afford to think longterm.

It would also be less bitey on commons if some images could be temporarily moved to this holding bay rather than deleted. It should even be possible to build this into the image uploader.

WSC

On 20 July 2012 14:09, Paul Selitskas <p.selitskas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Sylvain Machefert <smachefert@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/7/19 Maarten Dammers <maarten@mdammers.nl>
>>
>> Op 19-7-2012 16:06, Matthew Roth schreef:
>>
>> 2. Does anyone have experience in other countries with monuments that are
>> on the list but are still under copyright? Will we need to be clear that
>> some of the sites on the Register in the U.S. are not eligible for the
>> contest?
>>
>> I guess this is a very small percentage.
>
>
> In France there's noFOP and we've got some protected buildings that are
> still under copyright (as far as I know we don't know the exact number), we
> have started to use a special picture for them in the lists on wikipedia :
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:B%C3%A2timent_droit_d%27auteur.svg
> saying that the building is copyrighted.
>
> We also communicated about this topic with a blog post during the last
> competition :
> http://blog.wikimedia.fr/wiki-loves-monuments-et-le-droit-dauteur-3649 (in
> french, sorry). Our main problem was that the records describing buildings
> aren't always accurate and/or the architects aren't famous so for many 20th
> century buildings we don't really know if they are free or not.
>
> Sylvain
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

We are facing the same issue in Belarus. The estimate is 30%+....
monuments in cities.

--
З павагай,
Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas
Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects
p.selitskas@gmail.com, +375257408304
Skype: p.selitskas

_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org