Rexford:Given the relatively small amount of pictures, I can be part of the jury, if that's OK with you.About the tool: for 100 pictures, I don't think it's worth to adapt or create tools; even by hand, I think 100 pictures can be processed in one or two hours. I think it's more important to start defining a selection process so the jurors can start right away to work with the images. For example, you may ask each juror to pick 10 images, and then do a new selection round with only these. Or you may ask jurors to assign scores (1-10), and then simply sort the images by score and work with the best ones (or even pick winners immediately).Oscar2015-01-18 6:37 GMT-05:00 Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford@gmail.com>:As it stands now, we've not had Antone show interest in being a part of the jury.
Until the jury is formed, I think you can hold on a bit. We'll get back to you when the jury is ready.
rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford
On Jan 18, 2015 9:49 AM, "Ynhockey" <ynhockey@gmail.com> wrote:Sorry for being late into this conversaion, but I assume you're referring to the 2012 tool that I wrote, it still exists on Labs and I can set it up for you if it's still relevant. Keep me posted.—Yan (Ynhockey).On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov@wikimedia.org> wrote:Oh, and I told myself SOFIXIT, so I did. :)
A.On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Asaf Bartov <abartov@wikimedia.org> wrote:A.Thanks, Jean-Frédéric! I did not know about your tool. I did spend some time looking for a tool on Commons, most specifically here[1], but didn't find anything appropriate. It did not occur to me to just grep GitHub, though. :)Anyhow, my tool is on GitHub too[2], although it's incomplete. The category mode is working fine, but it was originally started (long ago) as a downloader for preparing images for offline Wikipedia editions, based on an article list, and supporting multiple parallel downloaders, and that part is incomplete. I'll get around to finishing that Some Day Soon.
But if anyone wants to use the tool and has questions, I'm happy to help.On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Jean-Frédéric <jeanfrederic.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi Asaf,Based on this need, I'm building a downloader tool (as a volunteer; this isn't done in my WMF role) to help create such collections of reduced-resolution (any size you want) images for a given Commons category. It's not quite ready for use, but in the meantime I've created the collection you wanted in the size you specified. It is 157 megabytes in size, and you can download it (in a 7-Zip[1] archive) from here[2].You might want to check out my CommonsDownloader <https://github.com/Commonists/CommonsDownloader>It quite does that, except for the category thing but it would be fairly trivial to add.Java users may also be interested in Édouard Hue implementation--Jean-Fred
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
--Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia FoundationImagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
--Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia FoundationImagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org