Four? I count five :-)
1. own work
2. free license
3. september
4. id
5. email confirmed
This can be explained in detail as recomandations, not rules: usefull to Wikipedia, high resolution, digital editing only if necessary, avoid people, specially not identifiable people without consent, general views as well as closer ones, no watermarks, no frames, not only good monuments but good shots, etc. In general, anything accepted on Commons should be acceptable for WLM, but some recomandations about the judging criteria may help.
Vicenç
From: lodewijk@effeietsanders.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:04:19 +0200
To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Photo format
Hi Elisardo,
thanks for your suggestion. Yes, we could do that. However, I would like it really a lot if we keep everything as simple as possible. Right now we have four simple rules - that means that adding one more rule is 25% more rules - is that worth it? Of course it speaks for itself that the jury will consider watermarked images as significantly worse quality. But why would we want to forbid people to upload them? Commons accepts them too, although they do reserve the right to remove the watermarks.
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu