Well I didn't watch every picture and then think is this good enough or not. The first
screening was in the category page, only the pictures which jumped out were clicked, then
only those of good quality were selected, this way I managed to go from 12.000 to 500 in
3-4 hours, The reviewer used in the US is a good idea. But if you want to make it jury
specific I would say show 20 pictures at a time and let people go fast throught the first
selection. What are the links to the other options?
Mvg,
Bas
From: p.selitskas(a)gmail.com
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:54:39 +0300
To: wikilovesmonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Jury tools [2nd turn]
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bas vb <basvb_wikipedia(a)live.nl> wrote:
My answer would be: browse the categories and
store the links (the
prehistoric way) in wikiformat with 500px, so you can use the previewpage
thing to watch them in a list on full scale together. This is the way I've
done it the last 2 years, and a nice extra is that after the contest I could
publish my lists with one click on the save button. See for example
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Basvb/100 and other subpages there.
This way even years later you can look at the best pictures and nominate
some for QI or FP if you want, or when you have the 11th article and want to
use a picture other than one of the top 10 winners. So publishing a longlist
for you country would be a real benefit.
Mvg,
Bas
________________________________
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:25:42 +0200
From: itzik(a)infra.co.il
To: wikilovesmonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Jury tools [2nd turn]
I hope tomorrow we can present the tool that we build and planning to use in
Israel
- Sent from my mobile device
On Sep 29, 2012 5:44 PM, "Paul Selitskas" <p.selitskas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm in the very best way shocked by results of the almost finished
Belarusian contest. That is more than 100 contestants with more than
5000 submissions! I'm very happy with great results in other countries
as well.
But as the contest is going to its end, there is a question about the
reviewing proccess. How should jury members pick the best photos?
Which software tools should they use? I'm even thinking about
developing a new one which would just retrieve photos via MWAPI and
then just give the jury members a choice out of hundreds of photos
(beforehand filtered to eliminate all low-quality, non-encyclopedic
stuff).
Looking through the mailing list archives, especially the Jury tools
thread, I haven't yet received an ultimate answer.
So, what is yours?
--
З павагай,
Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas
Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects
p.selitskas(a)gmail.com, +375257408304
Skype: p.selitskas
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing
list WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
That's a good way for just viewing a bunch of photos uploaded to get
the average quality level of submissions. That's a quite acceptable
way for Wikimedians in the jury.
That is definitely not in this world a good way of reviewing the
photos for other jury members, who although can click a photo to set
its rating mark or just discard the submission, they may be not
computer geniuses (few photographers or heritage experts). Moreover,
are we going to record the good photos and the bad ones down in a
notebook?
It's a reasonably acceptable way of things to be, but I believe there
is something a bit more easy to work with, like clicking "I approve
this" or setting the mark and the thing is done. Anyway, thank you
very much for the suggestion! Maybe it will be used as a Plan B, who
knows... :)
And thank you, Itzik! I'm waiting further news from your team!
--
Cheers,
Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas
Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects
p.selitskas(a)gmail.com, +375257408304
Skype: p.selitskas
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org