Unfortunately we cannot put it into an equation and the perfect photos will roll out :) However, I do think this is sufficiently covered by "originality" as one of the three judging criteria. The three criteria used are very broad and intentionally not pinning down all small things that people could be "rewarded" for. If we find out it is insufficient then we can change it for next year. 

With kind regards,

Lodewijk

2011/7/20 Nina Wikipedia <nina.wikipedia@gmail.com>
I thin if I have someone to drive a car and get permission it would be lovely to have pictures inside this church: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church. Ordenary you cant take pictures inside so you have to ask for it.  I have to stay the night in hotel also. In my wiki Kunsthistorie.com I have some pictures who are not free so you can take a look:
http://kunsthistorie.com/fagwiki/Urnes_stavkirke i think Wikipedia needs pictures like this and not only nice pictures taken outside monuments.
Den 20. juli 2011 kl. 17.24 skrev Ilario Valdelli:

> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Nina Wikipedia
> <nina.wikipedia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If someone can take pictures in buildings where it is hard to get pictures
>> (off the road, have to ask for permission in advance, need someone to open
>> etc) I think that should be a +. Maybe that should be in the criteria  ?
>> Nina
>> nina.wikipedia@gmail.com
>>
>
> I agree, the question is complicated to check that.
>
> Ilario
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu


_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu