On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Michael Maggs <Michael@maggs.name> wrote:
The UK jury, of three, looked through around 500 images (cut down from the original 7000 submissions).  That's not too much work for them provided they are all experienced with image evaluation and have the images downloaded so that they can use efficient rating software such as Adobe Lightroom.


I don't think it's so important to trim such list before providing to the jury.