On the source list it seems that all monuments are identified by its cadastre number and probably it is unique.
[1] http://www.ssmn.public.lu/legislation/maj-liste.pdf
Vicenç
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:46:08 +0200
> From: andre@molens.org
> To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> CC: Wlm-be@lists.wmnederland.nl
> Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Monuments without identifier
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:44:14AM -0700, Romaine Wiki wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > In the country Luxembourg we have monuments, but so far we know these monuments have no unique identifier. It seems an important aspect of the monument lists in other countries (Belgium, Netherlands, etc) that the photo's have an identifier so that they are easily matched with the monument lists. As we know nothing about unique identifiers, how do who solve that situation?
> >
> > - Should we leave the monuments without unique identifier?
> > - Should we create our own unique identifier? Like one based on for example the community with us giving a number to a monument in the order of when a monument got listed?
> > - Anyone a idea?
>
> Do all monuments have an adress? Can postalcode+streetnumber be unique enough
> perhaps (like in NL).
>
> Regards,
>
> Andre
> >
> > Greetings - Romaine
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu