To summarize, it's pretty clear: why the full list of 25 winners is not published in any referenceable way?// M.A. MonjasOn Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, ecemaml @ es.wikipedia <ecemaml@gmail.com> wrote:We're a bunch of volunteers asking for and receiving a grant for running a professional contest. Although tweeting the full list of winner is definitely cool, it's not professional at all to have to refer to a tweet to state that I scored 20th, for instance.// M.A. Monjas--On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Nicu Buculei <nicubunu@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, ecemaml @ es.wikipedia wrote:
> Yes, using Twitter as the only means for publishing a contest result is
> really unprofessional :-(
We are not professionals here, but a bunch of volunteers in an open
community. This is why I was bothered having communications first and
foremost inside a walled garden (twitter) instead of our open
community (Commons).
--
nicu :: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
--
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org