This is interesting: so it is possible to get a license for the use of the logo if used apprppriately.
Barbara, are you going to send the email?
Kind regards,
Els
This is a good point, but I'd imagine the WMF can grant a license for use of the logo. This seems like an entirely appropriate and favorable use, but IANAL.If you send an email to trademarks@wikimedia.org explaining the usage, they should be able to draw up a license agreement.thanks,Matthew--On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek@gmail.com> wrote:
2012/11/19 Els Arends <els@wikimedia.nl>:
> Okay, I get the point about the seasons.I guess it would be OK for free samples - but in fact - these extra
>
> Maybe others can voice their ideas about the Wikipedialogo and the
> Wikimedialogo in the colophon?
>
copies which are about to be purchased by chapters is a subject of
commercial use of Wikipedia logo by third party :-)
--
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
Matthew Roth
Global Communications Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
+1.415.839.6885 ext 6635
www.wikimediafoundation.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org