You are probably right that having it completely automated would have the potential of causing havok.

I think the solution similar to "unused images" is probably the better since it allows a person to make sure the category actually makes sense and (using the first of the two tools) can additionally recommend categories to be created.

/André

On 16 January 2013 18:25, Maarten Dammers <maarten@mdammers.nl> wrote:

Hi André,

Op 16-1-2013 0:43, André Costa schreef:

Would it be possible to populate the same field using the commons templates if they are present used on a (unique) category page? I.e. as is done at Category:Aaltohuset.

Technically yes, but I'm afraid of mistakes so I'm not doing it using a bot. I do plan to run some queries to suggest links to create (see .sql for the query):
* http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_top_images.txt : List of tagged Rijksmonumenten images by number of images with the same id. This can be used to suggest new categories to be created
* http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_commonscat_to_link.txt : List of categories that are tagged with a Rijksmonumenten template. This can be combined with the database to suggest missing links to create just like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database/Unused_images

Maarten

_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org