You are probably right that having it completely automated would have the
potential of causing havok.
I think the solution similar to "unused images" is probably the better
since it allows a person to make sure the category actually makes sense and
(using the first of the two tools) can additionally recommend categories to
be created.
/André
On 16 January 2013 18:25, Maarten Dammers <maarten(a)mdammers.nl> wrote:
Hi André,
Op 16-1-2013 0:43, André Costa schreef:
Would it be possible to populate the same field using the commons
templates if they are present used on a (unique) category page? I.e. as is
done at
Category:Aaltohuset<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aaltohus…
.
Technically yes, but I'm afraid of mistakes so I'm not doing it using a
bot. I do plan to run some queries to suggest links to create (see .sql for
the query):
*
http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_top_images.txt: List of
tagged Rijksmonumenten images by number of images with the same
id. This can be used to suggest new categories to be created
*
http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_commonscat_to_lin…: List of
categories that are tagged with a Rijksmonumenten template. This
can be combined with the database to suggest missing links to create just
like
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database/Unused_images
Maarten
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org