Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Help to find tools

On 12/05/14 00:06, Fhaidel Domínguez wrote: Hay volcados de commons del 20140401, 20140421 y 20140508, lo que nos permite saber qué ficheros estaban en la categoría *en esa fecha*. Pero no detectar un fichero añadido y eliminado en otra intermedia. Si podemos ignorar las imágenes borradas (por ejemplo, porque no pueden participar), se podría escanear un volcado buscando todos los ficheros que tuvieron la plantilla en alguna revisión. Sin embargo, si quisiéramos además incluir las borradas, habría que mirar los ficheros subidos y borrados en ese rango y comprobar todas y cada una de sus revisiones. Para resolver este problema en WLM, lo que hacía era vigilar la categoría, registrando cada pocos minutos las imágenes que se iban añadiendo, resultando en una aproximación bastante buena. Pero lógicamente no podemos usar esta estrategia para las imágenes de hace un mes :( La segunda pregunta es para sacar eso mismo que tienes en ese link. Gracias :) Y bueno, así son las cosas :) Pero para que conste en los registros, yo -------- English for the community -------- Thanks Platonides, > I already was thinking it wasn't possible but your idea is good for what > I'm looking for: > I know the time frame I would like to check: Apr 1st - May 31st 2014 > Now, if I know it... how can I get an old dump for images that were in > that category? Then, using CatScan I can compare and get the number in > the way you comment. There are commonswiki dumps for dates 20140401, 20140421, 20140508. This allows to know which files where there *at that specific date*. But not for a file added and removed at an intermediate date. If you don't mind about deleted files (eg, they can't participate), you can scan a dump for all files that contained the template on any revision. However, for including deleted files you would need to view the files uploaded and deleted in that timeframe and check each of their revisions‼ In order to solve this very same problem at WLM, what I did was to follow the category, registering every few minutes the images that were added, producing a quite good approximation. But we obviously can't do the same thing for images uploaded last month :/ My second question was looking for what you exactly got in your link. > That's great! Thanks :) And well... facts are facts :) Just for the records, I'm not a > participant but a contributor user. Sadly I'm not a participant > according to the contest rules. :( But there's something more > interesting: the oldest user is in fact the first participant. > Thank you so much! > Fhaidel.- _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org