regardsI know that measuring quantities is easier, but it's not an evaluation, are simple numbers without a clear "strategy".If the aim of Wikimedia is to improve also the qualities, it's clear the direction that the movement is taking.Hi Lodewijk,it's not the fisrt time that I am saying that the measures of the evaluation are able to measure quantities and not qualities.On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk@effeietsanders.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi all,it seems that the WMF evaluation department has once again put together an evaluation of Wiki Loves Monuments. Out of curiosity, were any of the organizers involved in this? A quick glance suggests some factual errors, and again a big focus on assuming WLM is a consistent project, that is similar in each country (while in reality it is a diverse collection of projects, tailored to the needs of each country, by its community) and with a focus towards number crunching.Statements that begin with 'the average Wiki Loves Monuments implementation/contest' make my eyes bleed... Did anyone make a more thorough analysis of the report?Best,Lodewijk
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
--Linkedin: Ilario ValdelliTwitter: Ilario ValdelliIlario ValdelliWikipedia: Ilario
Wikimedia CH
Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre
Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera
Switzerland - 8008 ZürichSkype: valdelliFacebook: Ilario Valdelli