>
> We can summarize the yesterday discussion and Upload-form-demonstration,
> I think we all agree so far:
>
> An enormously important point for the entire project WLM is the ability
> to simplify the uploading process for the participants of the photo
> contest. Basically, this is quiet easy to create, but we must emphasize
> the following:
>
> 1. Before any participation is the registration - the actual situation
> is not reduceable.
>
> indeed
> �
>
>
> 2. To the participants it must be given some specific requirements
> without choice: That is: "Own work" as well as the predefined license.
>
> yup
> �
>
>
> 3. Thus there remains only that the participants upload his image and
> the ability, to give a personal description (if desired).
>
> Upload the image and give identifier (either prefilled or not)
> �
>
>
> That's all from the perspective of the participant. Our perspective
> results in further, much more important considerations:
>
> 1. We need to identify the images - The easiest way is a country code
> and the object ID as a minimal setting.
>
> Country code: campaign (which form do you use)
> ID: identifier field
> �
>
>
> 2. To reduce further work from our side, the images should be
> categorized at the same time while the upload-process takes place, but
> this requires a good category management, which at least will assume the
> category-system from Wikipedia to Commons.
>
> This will have to happen with a bot.�
> �
>
>
> 3. In addition, we should automatically hand over as much information as
> possible (or necessary). This is: name of the object, address of the
> object (district, town name, adress), geographic coordinates, perhaps
> also an existing short description of inside the monument-tables. But
> that presupposes the access to the upload-form directly from Wikipedia
> (cultural monument tables).
>
> This will have to happen after uploading with a bot.�
> �
>
>
> 4. Images of cultural objects, which are not officially designated
> cultural monuments (and therefore not included in the lists) can be
> uploaded via the parish or other articles, thus we need an
> Community-Code �as the ID key, zip code, an the country code as a
> minimum requirement.
>
> If the monument is not in the list, they can not participate in the
> contest unfortunately. At least, that is the very basis of the contest,
> if an exception to that is necessary, lets discuss that in a seperate
> thread.�
> �
>
>
> 5. We need to clarify that only images can participate in this contest,
> which are uploaded in September. This can be regulated, so that any
> upload from the relevant pages with the special upload form is only
> possible, when this forms are unlocked on september, 1. Only with the
> upload form the object ID can be transfered.
>
> A bot can easily change templates of all uploads with the WLM template
> which are uploaded before Sept 1. No need to worry about that.�
> �
>
>
> 6. We need to ensure in Commons itself, that any uploading for the
> competition must be easily visible through a special selection of
> different forms. This requires a clear indication (banners etc)
>
> All this concerns only one aspect of the complete project, but it is
> neccessary for the persistent use of the images via Commons, as well as
> for the assessment by the national judging panels.
>
> That implementation is possible to handover all the information with an
> link, I demonstrated yesterday. Our task should be to explore the
> already existing links to the individual objects within Wikipedia and to
> integrate into the overall concept.
>
> Technically that is possible yes, however it is unsure if this would
> also be possible in a simplified form. The form you used is
> unfortunately incomprehensible for most mortals. I usually suggest that
> my grandmother should be able to participate.�
>
> �
>
>
> greetings from Vienna
>
> Hubertl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org