Both approaches are posible: to subcategorize them manually or to help the bot to do it botically. The last one is more efficient en the long term.
How-to:
1. Add to the file the monument template with the identifier. If it does not correspond to any monument listed, remove the file from the main categoy of monuments.
2. Add the template {{Commonscat}} to the list where the monument is listed. Usually it is the category for monuments of a city or region.
3. If the monument has its own category, add the parameter commonscat=, or similar, in the row template for the monument. If your row template does not have such parameter, consider to add it. It can be usuful for a "see more pics" link or, at least, it is useful for a precise categorization by ErfgoedBot.
More info at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database/Categorization
BTW, I am not sure how it works if the template commonscat has its parameter migrated to Wikidata.
Vicenç
From: lodewijk@effeietsanders.org
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:29:50 +0200
To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] ErfgoedBot status
Hi Maarten,
Thanks for the update. Just to make sure people understand what exactly needs to happen to these categories: as I understand it, they should be bumped down at least one level to a region? Or could people help in a more structured way, by connecting the identifiers with the right category, somehow? What is the most intelligent approach in the current setup?
Best,
Lodewijk
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org