Snehitare, This is some time when I'm on a Wiki vacation from Kn Wiki and concentrating more on the other responsibilities I have in the Wiki world and outside. But before I go largely inactive on Wiki (although I'll be available for anyone who needs help), I have couple of things to put forward and bring into discussion. Please WAKE UP, and take part in this discussion. The future of Kannada counterpart of the project might very much depend on decisions we make now. Lately, Kannada Wikipedia has had its share of stubs, one-liners, spam, POV articles, vandalized articles (that still remain) and many other issues. I would like to bring some of these to discussion and solicit some opinions and participation so that we're headed the better way, if not the best. 1) Stubs: Few contributors were involved in creation of stubs in huge volume. Although stubs are welcome, special cases like these when stubs are being created by just one or two editors on just a single category probably makes Wikipedia with just few thousand articles saturated. These stubs are more likely deserve to be called "spam". Assuming that no one would be editing these movie stubs (one-liners) that have been created in huge numbers, the articles would be reducing interest among would-be editors who visit Wikipedia for reading. Also because quality of articles is more important than numbers, we ought to concentrate more on filling up the "very much needed articles" rather than movie stubs that probably no-one is going to edit in years to come. 2) Policies: Kannada Wikipedia urgently needs some policies drafted and put in place. The project, at this point, has lost much of the focus, although the project is intended to grow with indefinite contributions from many volunteers. Looking forward to some discussion on these off the Wiki. Cheers, - h.p. -- "Creativity requires the courage to let go of certainties." ~ Erich Fromm