--Hi,I think it's better to have two lists of ethics statements for all the journals: (1) Common to all journals, and (2) Journal specific. This is because experimental and research topics covering human samples, animal usage, etc. should (may) be dealt differently as compared to the topics in Humanities.JitendraOn Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Mikael Häggström <editor.in.chief@wikijmed.org> wrote:______________________________MikaelHi all WikiJournal participants,
I've now written a draft of an ethics statement to contain the main topics from the Committee on Publication Ethics: WikiJournal of Medicine/Draft of ethics statement
This was started as a statement for WikiJournal of Medicine, but it seems best to have one common ethics statement for all WikiJournals. Do you agree with this?
Also, additions and corrections are very welcome. In particular, there are some headers of possible topics to add, but with yet no text. I suggest that we remove all headers of empty sections in 2 weeks, so that we can move forward and ratify the ethics statement.I recommend that we continue the discussion in the wiki: Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Ethics_statement Best regards,_________________
WikiJournal-en mailing list
WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiJSci" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to WikiJSci+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
To post to this group, send email to WikiJSci@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/WikiJSci .
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/WikiJSci/CAMwwD84AqypaB7d_ .4znrrC3t85-uSiGTgUipzEJNL7hbLr 9YLQ%40mail.gmail.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .