Buongiorno,
seguo da sempre Wikipedia ma mi sono iscritta solo da pochissimo. Averndo
intnezione di inserire una voce,mi sono documentata ed ho scoperto che la
stessa tempo fa fu inserita e poi e poi cancellata due volte, una volta per
problemi di copyright e l'altra, dopo una discussione/votazione, in quanto
ritenuta non enciclopedica/non verificabile. Ho letto tutte le sezioni
relative a queste fattispecie, nonchè alla possibilità di reinserimento, ma
mi rimane un dubbio che spero possiate aiutarmi a risolvere. Se io avessi
delle info, supportate da fonti attendibili, che dimostrassero che la voce
può essere invece ritenuta enciclopedica (parliamo di una biografia), potrei
far richeista di renserimento di questa vocea? Sarebbe comunque considerato
forzatura o vandalismo?
Grazie in anticipo,
Anna
--
Le cose facili comportano semplicità, la semplicità comporta leggerezza, la
leggerezza o non è interessante o non vale il prezzo dell'attenzione, le
cose poco interessanti sono cose mediocri, la mediocrità e nemica della
grandezza, la grandezza disdegna le cose facili.
Il buon Magnus Manske ha creato un bellissimo Widget
che crea delle "finestrelle" per gli articoli di Wikipedia (a quanto pare,
tutti i progetti in tutte le lingue):
metti il titolo, e il widget ti fa scegliere l'immagine e mette i link.
Non so bene come "persoinalizzare" la cosa per i progetti fratelli,
ma credo sia uno strumento utile e carino (soprattutto per blogger, siti
esterni, GLAM e via dicendo).
Il link del widget è qui:
http://toolserver.org/~magnus/widget/index.html?article=Hoxne_Hoard&run=1
Le istruzioni per personalizzarlo nella mail qui sotto.
Aubrey
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>
Date: 2011/3/26
Subject: Re: [cultural-partners] Widget
To: Wikimedia Chapters cultural partners coordination <
cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch>
Now available on en.wikipedia, can be ported to other wikipedias (and
other projects, with minor modifications).
To use, add this line:
importScript('MediaWiki:PrettyLinkWidget.js');
to your vector.js user subpage (e.g. [[User:Magnus_Manske/vector.js]])
Screenshot is here:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:PrettyLinkWidget_s…
Still using tables for layout though; feel free to change that, but
keep IE in mind...
Code is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:PrettyLinkWidget.js
Cheers,
Magnus
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Pharos <pharosofalexandria(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Cool, I'd love to see this tool fully integrated into MediaWiki :)
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> (User:Pharos)
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen
> <palnatoke(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about doing it in CSS-boxes instead of tables?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ole
>>
>> --
>> http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588
>> _______________________________________________
>> cultural-partners mailing list
>> cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch
>> http://lists.wikimedia.ch/listinfo/cultural-partners
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cultural-partners mailing list
> cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch
> http://lists.wikimedia.ch/listinfo/cultural-partners
>
_______________________________________________
cultural-partners mailing list
cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch
http://lists.wikimedia.ch/listinfo/cultural-partners
Sapevatelo!
C
---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
Da: "Denny Vrandečić" <denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de>
Data: 25/giu/2012 12:29
Oggetto: [Wikimedia-l] Language links and double language links on the
Wikipedias
A: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Hi all,
I ran some analysis last week, to get some numbers out of the
Wikipedia language links. One type of reports that were generated was
the list of all articles in the main namespaces of the Wikipedias that
link to more than one article in another language edition of Wikipedia
(so called double language links). There are not that many of them
(about 19,000 in total), split by language, all available here:
<http://simia.net/languagelinks/>
Double language links are not errors per se, but they contain a few
nuisances
* they lead to two links in the language links list that just look the
same (you have to hover over them to see that they link to different
languages), which is not really optimal from the user experience side
* they are not saved in the langlinks table and thus are ignored in
certain reports and also in the respective export
I am not sure how to reach out to the respective Wikipedia
communities, or if I should at all. Should I post to their respective
version of the village pump? Remembering from the time I was active on
the Croatian Wikipedia, I would have appreciated that list to check
the entries. I reckoned the wikipedia-l list would be the right place,
but that list looks rather dead.
Cheers,
Denny
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Sapevatelo!
C
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Forrester <jforrester(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: 21 June 2012 14:22
Subject: Early test of new Visual Editor test now live on mediawiki.org
To: wikimediaannounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Hello everyone,
Today, I'm delighted to say that we at the Wikimedia Foundation have
launched a new prototype “visual editor” for MediaWiki. The visual
editor will be a new editing environment that won’t require everyone
to learn our special markup language in order to contribute to our
projects.
Though it’s possible to learn what wikitext means and use it
powerfully, many of our editors, and especially new editors, want to
contribute content, not learn technical formatting. We identified the
difficulty in learning wikitext as a key inhibitor to growing our
editor community in the Wikimedia movement’s strategic plan[0].
We want the process of learning how to edit to be trivial, so our
volunteers, both new and experienced, can devote themselves to what
they edit. That’s why we’re building the visual editor, so that
contributing to a wiki is as easy and natural as other modern editing
systems, and new editors are not dissuaded from making their changes.
You may remember a similar announcement in December 2011, when we
revealed a developer prototype of our “visual editor"[1], but after a
great deal of feedback, we've reworked it so that it's more useful to
our our community of users.
We learned a lot from building our first prototype. It was great how
many of you helped with feedback, bug reports and comments about how
we were doing. In the months since then, based on your feedback and
technical issues we encountered, we’ve overhauled the entire editor.
We changed the technical design and how it works, rewriting its
components so that we can support more editors more easily. We’ve also
integrated it into the MediaWiki platform, so now it can load and edit
wiki articles, and not just sit separately.
To build this iteration of our open source visual editor, we have been
working with some of the team from Wikia, a collaborative publisher
that operates the largest network of video game, entertainment and
lifestyle wikis in the world. We both believe that this kind of tool
should be built not just for the Wikimedia wiki projects, but for
everyone using MediaWiki software, and when it’s done we look forward
to including the visual editor “out of the box” for anyone setting up
a wiki with our software.
Thanks to all this, our new prototype is now live on mediawiki.org[2].
This is just a demonstration, and very far from a finished product —
for example, we haven’t yet added image or table handling. It’s
currently locked down to only work on a self-contained area of the
wiki, so that it doesn’t encounter any unsupported content or break
anything else. We intend to work on small pieces of the overall story,
releasing a new version every two weeks or so, and adding features
one-by-one until the editor is good enough to deploy for everyone (and
release in MediaWiki’s core).
Over the next few weeks and months, we will be working with you in the
community to find bugs, to focus on what our priorities should be, and
most importantly, to make sure that what we’re building is right for
you and that it supports your “workflow”.
So please, try out the prototype, see our frequently-asked
questions[3], and tell us what you think[4].
[0] - https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Movement_Strategic_Plan_Summ…
[1] - https://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/12/13/help-test-the-first-visual-editor-dev…
[2] - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor:Welcome
[3] - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Visual_editor/June_2012_release_FAQs
[4] - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Visual_editor/Feedback
On behalf of the Visual Editor Team:
Trevor Parscal, Inez Korczyński, Roan Kattouw, Rob Moen, Subramanya
Sastry, Brion Vibber, Gabriel Wicke, Christian Williams.
--
James D. Forrester
Product Manager for Visual Editor and Flagged Revisions
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester(a)wikimedia.org | @jdforrester | +1 415-839-6885 x6844
--
James D. Forrester
Product Manager for Visual Editor and Flagged Revisions
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
jforrester(a)wikimedia.org | @jdforrester | +1 415-839-6885 x6844
_______________________________________________
Internal-l mailing list
Internal-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-l
