On 02/02/2008, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Looks cool. One thing you've missed, though: The first time I ran it, it found a disambig page, and told me: "This article is an orphan (except maybe for redirects). Look around and add some links!" Disambigs being orphans is a good thing. Should be relatively easy to make an exception for them.

On 02/02/2008, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Thanks. You are a god. -- Alex (Majorly) http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Majorly

On 2/3/08, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote: Ok, because ten other people were about to suggest this anyway: a way to focus the choice of article. Instead of random, "random within a category" would be great, or it could try following links from your contributions or something. Just to improve the chance of working on something you actually know something about and care about. Also, presenting some of the "statistics" graphically would perhaps be better, and some way of seeing at a glance if any of the stats are unusual (like 25 links of which 1 exist). IMHO it would also be worth showing the article somewhere, so you can quickly get a feel for whether you want to jump into it or not. Steve