In a message dated 4/27/2009 4:39:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time, doc.wikipedia(a)ntlworld.com writes: Now, there are fairly likely also to be mentions of this in written sources - but it is equally the case that no-one may locate them during a 5-7 day afd.>> ---------------------------- I'm not convinced that a property's mere existence on the National Trust website makes it "notable". We have many cases where things are mentioned in this or that place and yet that thing is not "notable" the way we use the word. It would be up to the author to explain why this particular property is notable if any AfD were brought. On a second note. With _http://books.google.com/books?oe=UTF-8&um=1&ei=v0v2SbnOH6DmsAOC6sz… operty-revision&cd=1&q=the&btnG=Search+Books_ (http://books.google.com/books?oe=UTF-8&um=1&ei=v0v2SbnOH6DmsAOC6szc… G=Search+Books) over six *million* books now scanned, I think it's a much harder cry to claim that some thing *not citable in Google Books* is yet still notable. I think six million books probably covers almost all territory that we want to cover this decade. I'd have to be convinced as to why a person or thing, which cannot be found there, is notable. Will Johnson **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220572846x1201387511/aol?redir=htt… Aprilfooter427NO62)