On 6/8/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
It seems that MONGO, the self-appointed judge, jury,
and executioner
on the subject of attack sites, has reversed himself from yesterday
and now considers WikiTruth to be an attack site (although the
article on it was speedy-kept when nominated for deletion yesterday
by an apparent single-purpose troll account). He's now going through
the site in a rampage suppressing WikiTruth links from various and
sundry user, talk, and archive pages, an activity that's always good
for getting support for getting rid of the silly attack-site-link
ban, not to mention attracting more attention to the attack sites
themselves in the process.
--
== Dan ==
How odd. A userid was created yesterday which nominated the Wikitruth
article for deletion, based on BADSITES, and a bunch of
none-too-convincing arguments. It's about the most obvious example of
a straw man nomination I've seen in a while; I hope I am not accused
of trying to revise history by saying that.
As for drawing attention to the site, it's pretty clear that both the
nomination, and in particular your advertising the site on this list,
will have far more of an effect in this regard. Was that your intent?