Subject line says all: is there an organizational similarity between Wikipedia and Quaker meetings?
Anyone is theoretically authorized to speak/contribute; some (elders/sysops) are slightly more equal than others; subtle social mechanisms make the overall process more orderly than one might expect; decision-making is done by consensus; deliberately disruptive behavior occasionally occurs and is dealt with but the process is not easy...
Sorry, what is particular to a quaker meeting ?
dpbsmith@verizon.net a écrit:
Subject line says all: is there an organizational similarity between Wikipedia and Quaker meetings?
Anyone is theoretically authorized to speak/contribute; some (elders/sysops) are slightly more equal than others; subtle social mechanisms make the overall process more orderly than one might expect; decision-making is done by consensus; deliberately disruptive behavior occasionally occurs and is dealt with but the process is not easy...
On Thu, 27 May 2004 21:56:57 +0200, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry, what is particular to a quaker meeting ? From [[Quaker]]:
#REDIRECT [[Religious Society of Friends]]
Erm. From [[Religious Society of Friends]]: The Religious Society of Friends, commonly known as Quakers or Friends, is a religious community founded in England during the 17th century. Quaker congregations are scattered across the world. Though the number of Quakers in the world is rather small, Quakers have shaped the world to a degree far beyond their numbers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious Society of Friends I will not copy and paste the entire article here. :)
Here's what goes on.
Everyone, after preliminary greetings, sits silently. When the spirit moves them anyone in the congregation may speak. This does not result in a spirited conversation or an argument but again the group sits quietly until the spirit moves someone else.
The group as a whole will not take a position not supported by all after delibration.
As noted in the original post, the spirits which move some are given more weight than others and occasionally the athmosphere of quiet contemplation is disrupted.
Fred
From: Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com Reply-To: anthere9@yahoo.com, English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:56:57 +0200 To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Wikipedia and Quaker meetings
Sorry, what is particular to a quaker meeting ?
dpbsmith@verizon.net a écrit:
Subject line says all: is there an organizational similarity between Wikipedia and Quaker meetings?
Anyone is theoretically authorized to speak/contribute; some (elders/sysops) are slightly more equal than others; subtle social mechanisms make the overall process more orderly than one might expect; decision-making is done by consensus; deliberately disruptive behavior occasionally occurs and is dealt with but the process is not easy...
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l