Plagiarism does have something to do with the law if it is a breach of
copyright. I assume that the banned editor is hostile, so being
defensive may be prudent.
The key points are that the GDFL allows derivative use of the text
provided it is correctly attributed. The use described is not
derivative and changes the attribution - this contravenes the GDFL.
With respect,
Steven
/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:StevenZenith/
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:33:52 -0500
From: Rob <gamaliel8(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Tracking banned user Andrew Morrow
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Message-ID:
<3bd63d170602151433j3ee83e6flc3bf99079b655ea9(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 2/15/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Plagiarism has nothing to do with law,
True, but the original poster also claimed it was a copyright issue, which
would make it something of a legal matter. I simply forgot to completely
repeat his point.