In a message dated 5/5/2009 12:31:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.wiki@gmail.com writes:
- user#217869: pov warring!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @217869 is so!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @both: u blocked 24 hrs 3rr>>
----------------
Redundant. I suggest replacing the 100 most common responses with code numbers.
Will
************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221322931x1201367171/aol?redir=http...; bcd=May5509AvgfooterNO115)
2009/5/5 WJhonson@aol.com:
In a message dated 5/5/2009 12:31:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.wiki@gmail.com writes:
- user#217869: pov warring!! - @83476238 not so! - @217869 is so!! - @83476238 not so! - @both: u blocked 24 hrs 3rr>>
Redundant. I suggest replacing the 100 most common responses with code numbers.
Acronyms and abbrevs are more conventional:
- user#217869: [[TP:POVW]] - @83476238 [[TP:NS]] - @217869 [[TP:IS]] - @83476238 [[TP:NS]] - @both: [[TP:BLOCK]] 24hrs [[TP:3RR]]
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:35 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 5/5/2009 12:31:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.wiki@gmail.com writes:
- user#217869: pov warring!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @217869 is so!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @both: u blocked 24 hrs 3rr>>
Redundant. I suggest replacing the 100 most common responses with code numbers.
Will
In fact since there are some 96 ascii characters, and 140 + digits to play with, we could encode 96^140 messages without even straining the system. All you;'d need would be a suitable decoder in your twitter reader.......
It raises the interesting philosophical question, when is the meaning in the message, and when is it in the decoder? And what if it's in neither or both?
FT2
Skip the [[....]], not needed. All uppercase or numbers following a TP: (or equivalent one character symbol)... or even forbid all uppercase except as used in links....
FT2
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.comwrote:
2009/5/5 WJhonson@aol.com:
In a message dated 5/5/2009 12:31:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.wiki@gmail.com writes:
- user#217869: pov warring!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @217869 is so!!
- @83476238 not so!
- @both: u blocked 24 hrs 3rr>>
Redundant. I suggest replacing the 100 most common responses with code numbers.
Acronyms and abbrevs are more conventional:
- user#217869: [[TP:POVW]]
- @83476238 [[TP:NS]]
- @217869 [[TP:IS]]
- @83476238 [[TP:NS]]
- @both: [[TP:BLOCK]] 24hrs [[TP:3RR]]
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/5/5 FT2 ft2.wiki@gmail.com:
It raises the interesting philosophical question, when is the meaning in the message, and when is it in the decoder? And what if it's in neither or both?
"Thomas Dalton" thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote in message news:a4359dff0905051244n460c6bfap24e8eb8262985906@mail.gmail.com...
2009/5/5 FT2 ft2.wiki@gmail.com:
It raises the interesting philosophical question, when is the meaning in the message, and when is it in the decoder? And what if it's in neither or both?
(...)
[[Socratic method]] teaching has more relevance to the question. In the method, students are led to conclusions in their own words, from questions that a teacher raises. Those questions can be binary, open or closed. If I read Isaac Asimov in "The Edge of Tomorrow" correctly, Socrates entertained a slave with Euclid's fifth postulate, which is a definition of parallel, and one that mathematicians do not always use. Naturally, the difficulty in escaping your initial conclusions is of use to a lawyer in persuasion. It hard to use the socratic method outside of a small classroom in real time (without paper). It is relatively easy to use it in mail, which has no real-time requirements, nor any penalty for delays or the null response. In short, you learn more about mathematics from exercises than anything a teacher will say.