"Jeff Raymond" wrote
I'm much more likely to vote support on a
candidate with a long
history, but some questions about, if I know that if they abuse the tools
or continually do the wrong thing, I can work to get them removed. That's
not the case currently.
I don't find this a very reassuring argument.
Admins must, in the first place, be trusted people. That's pretty basic. The various
criteria, hoops to jump through, questionaires, cavils about 'admin material' and
scruples about how and in what spaces people edit (ugh) are secondary. I would prefer to
see more people promoted, who just add good content. Those, typically, will have the
smarts to understand policy and its uses. I do not want to see more people who are subject
to reservations on their discretion become admin. Wait a few months and take a second
view, yes.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information