Alphax wrote:
Daniel P. B. Smith wrote:
On a trustworthiness scale of 0 to 10, I'd
pesonally score the Register
as 3, the Guardian as 9.5.
And Slashdot as 2, Drudge as 4, and Wikipedia as, um, about a 7?
I'd actually give Wikipedia an 8-8.5 on trustworthiness. Writing quality
is another thing entirely.
It would be foolish in the extreme to try and rate Wikipedia as a whole,
since unlike these other places it lacks anything like a uniform
editorial hand. Rating individual articles makes sense, and I suppose
you could generate various averages as approximations, but this only
goes so far.
(as we await the debut of an article rating feature)
--Michael Snow