From: Fastfission <fastfission(a)gmail.com> Date: 2006/01/01 Sun PM 03:17:10 EST To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org> Subject: Re: Re: [WikiEN-l] Article: Childlove movement On 1/1/06, homey2005(a)sympatico.ca <homey2005(a)sympatico.ca> wrote: > That's insufficient for NPOV, indeed to use a term simply because a

Not to put a bee in your bonnet but we do have an article on [[White nationalism]]. It actually provides a pretty good example of the best way of dealing with this sort of thing: "White nationalism is a political and social movement to advance the social and economic interests of white or Caucasian people." "White nationalists explicitly deny being racial supremacists, arguing that they merely wish for each group of people with shared heritage, including white people, to be allowed to promote and preserve its heritage, and do not desire to oppress or dominate other races as racial supremacists do. Critics, however, argue that white nationalism intersects with, or is a euphemism for, white supremacy." Now obviously in all cases this level of "neutrality" is not completely warranted -- something like "Holohoax" for example which is nothing but a perjorative. I don't know enough about the case in question to have any worthwhile opinion but I think this is the sort of thing that MGM is getting at. Other examples include distinctions like [[Pro-life]]/[[Anti-abortion movement]]. When something is legitimately a proper name of a "movement" or organized campaign it should generally have an article using its established name, even if it very quickly explains that the name itself is in dispute. Generally speaking, of course. FF _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l