Snowspinner wrote:
On Oct 24, 2005, at 12:06 PM, David Gerard wrote:
I would say not in the least, because we're primarily writing for the Web. 32 kilobytes (which used to be a hard technical limit but I still think is a very good *stylistic* limit) is 6000 words, which is a LOT of text to read on a screen. It's really quite a lot even if you print it (about ten or so pages). Anything longer than 32k really needs some attention to what can possibly be spun out.
On the other hand, I've seen many an article that starts spinning out stuff well before it's sensible - mysteriously, it's the "criticism of" sections that always are the first to go. Wonder why that could be.
Gosh! etc ;-)
There's nothing wrong with spinning out "criticism of" sections as log as a good summary is left behind in the main article, so that the split is main/sub rather than POV/POV. This is of course an editorial matter.
- d.