I have a question regarding Wikipedia's official dispute resolution process: Flcelloguy made a statement in an Arbcom case, "I will be more than happy to detail the mediation more clearly or to clarify any questions that Arbitrators may have regarding this mediation"

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration...

Flcelloguy further stated, "The mediation is on Wikipedia and is available at Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Cberlet_and_Nobs01 and its corresponding subpages."

When a party to the ArbCom case attempted to place the Summary of Dispute in evidence, he was rebuffed by the Chairman, "Material from the mediation is confidential."

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitr...

Now which is it? Is Mediation material (a) available for Arbitrators to review (b) confidential and not allowable in evidence (c) another example of who you and your friends are in getting a fair hearing?

nobs01